Equality impact assessment (EIA) form: evidencing paying due regard to protected characteristics

(Form updated October 2025)

 

Shared Ownership Policy

 

An Equality Impact Assessment (EIA) form is a document that proves paying due regard by considering protected characteristics. EIAs that accompany reports presented to Councillors for decision-making are published with the committee papers on our website and are also available in hard copy at the relevant meetings.

Section 1: Initial Equality Impact Assessment Screening

This section documents the equality screening process of actual or potential impacts of the proposed activity on a specific protected characteristic, along with NYC's additional agreed-upon characteristics, to determine whether a full Equality Impact Assessment (EIA) is necessary or appropriate.

Basic Details

Directorate

Community Development

Service area

Housing

Proposal being screened

Shared Ownership Policy

Officer(s) carrying out screening

Imogen Downie

Lead Officer and contact details

Imogen Downie, Housing Policy and Strategy Officer (Service Improvement)
imogen.downie@northyorks.gov.uk

Date of the assessment

Feb 2025

Please describe briefly what this EIA is about.

(e.g. are you starting a new service, changing how you do something, or stopping doing something?)

Development of a unified Shared Ownership Policy for North Yorkshire Council to bring together legacy approaches into a single consistent framework for managing shared ownership homes.

What does the authority hope to achieve by it? (E.g. to save money, meet increased demand, do things in a better way.) 

The authority aims to create a single, consistent Shared Ownership Policy that replaces the varied legacy approaches inherited from former councils. The policy will provide clarity, fairness and transparency for shared owners, support consistent decisionmaking, and ensure management of shared ownership homes aligns with legislation, lease requirements and good practice.

 

Further Details

1.1  How have stakeholders been involved in this policy/ decision/ proposal? (e.g. a consultation exercise)

Stakeholders have contributed through internal engagement with Legal Services and Housing teams during the development of the draft policy. A tenant focus group with shared owners is also being planned to gather further feedback and ensure the policy is clear, practical and reflects lived experience.

1.2  Will the proposal have a significant effect on how other organisations operate? (e.g. partners, funding criteria, etc.).  Please explain briefly

No significant impacts on other organisations are expected. The policy sets out North Yorkshire Council’s own approach to managing shared ownership homes and does not change the responsibilities of external organisations such as developers, management companies or other landlords.

1.3  Impact on people with any of the following protected characteristics as defined by the Equality Act 2010, or NYC’s additional agreed characteristics 

Tick and indicate which protected characteristics are identified as relevant to the proposal (positive, negative, neutral or don’t know). 

Protected characteristic

Impact

 

Comments

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Don't know

 

Age

 

 

X

 

From information currently available we can estimate that 51% of our tenants are aged over 60. In 2021, 25% of the county’s adult population was over the age of 65. This is higher than the national percentage of

 

18.4%. This means that our tenant population is significantly more aged than the average population for North Yorkshire and the country.

 

By 2035, 32.60% of North Yorkshire’s total population will be aged 65+ and 5.97% will be aged 85+.

 

Nationally 23.26% will be 65+ and 4.05% will be 85+ by 2035.

 

Less than 5% of our tenant population are under 29. North Yorkshire has a lower proportion of young people than the national average- 24.5% under 25 compared to 29.2% nationally.

 

Our ambitions will not have any anticipated impacts on people specifically due to them sharing this particular protected characteristic. 

Disability

 

 

X

 

North Yorkshire has a lower proportion (19.3%) of people with a disability or long-term limiting illness whose day-to-day activities are limited a lot- against the national average of 23.69%.

 

However, this will rise to 20.89% of the 65+ population in North Yorkshire, against a national average of 24.86%.

 

Our ambitions will not have any anticipated impacts on people specifically due to them sharing this particular protected characteristic. 

Sex

 

 

x

 

The proportion of females is slightly higher (51%) than that of males (49%).

 

This pattern is reflected across all localities, with the exception of Richmondshire, where the large number of predominantly male military personnel have the effect of reversing the proportions.

Our ambitions will not have any anticipated impacts on people specifically due to them sharing this particular protected characteristic. 

 

Race (including GRTS)

 

 

X

 

North Yorkshire has a much lower proportion (4.77%) of people who identify with a non-UK identity than the national average (12%).

Our ambitions will not have any anticipated impacts on people specifically due to them sharing this particular protected characteristic. 

 

Gender reassign-ment

 

 

X

 

In the 2021 census 1478 (0.28%) of residents across North Yorkshire identified themselves as transsexual or with a gender identity different to that registered at birth. 

Our ambitions will not have any anticipated impacts on people specifically due to them sharing this particular protected characteristic. 

 

Sexual orientation

 

 

x

 

In the 2021 census 11,291 (2.2%) of residents across North Yorkshire identified themselves as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, or Other (LGB+). 

Our ambitions will not have any anticipated impacts on people specifically due to them sharing this particular protected characteristic. 

 

Religion or belief

 

 

x

 

North Yorkshire has higher levels of Christians (55.6%) than the national average (46.2%), and lower levels of all other religions than the national average. Percentages of those with no religion or not stating their religion are broadly similar to the national average. 

Our ambitions will not have any anticipated impacts on people specifically due to them sharing this particular protected characteristic. 

 

Pregnancy or maternity

 

 

x

 

In 2021 there were 5133 live births in North Yorkshire.  

 

In 2020 the conception rate per 1000 for under 18’s was 10.9. This is below the rate for England (13). 

 

In 2020/21 4.2% of deliveries in North Yorkshire were to mothers from ethnic minorities, compared to the England value of 21.6%. 

Our ambitions will not have any anticipated impacts on people specifically due to them sharing this particular protected characteristic. 

 

Marriage or civil partnership

 

 

x

 

A higher percentage of North Yorkshire’s population is married or in a civil partnership (53.7%) than the national average (46.8%) 

 

Our ambitions will not have any anticipated impacts on people specifically due to them sharing this particular protected characteristic. 

 

NYC’s additional characteristics

People in rural areas

 

 

x

 

The population in North Yorkshire is generally sparser than the national average (77 people per square kilometre as opposed to 434 nationally). In some parts of the county this is lower still (Ryedale 36, Richmondshire 38, Craven 48, Hambleton 69).  

 

Our ambitions will not have any anticipated impacts on people specifically due to them sharing this particular protected characteristic. 

 

People on a low income

 

 

x

 

The proportion of households in deprivation in North Yorkshire reduced between 2011 and 2021. In 2011 52.1% of households in North Yorkshire were deprived in at least one of the four dimensions (employment, education, health and disability, housing).  

 

By 2021 this had fallen to 46.7%. This 5.4 percentage point reduction in North Yorkshire compared with a 5.9 percentage point reduction across England as a whole, with the proportion of households in deprivation in North Yorkshire remaining below the national average. 

 

Our ambitions will not have any anticipated impacts on people specifically due to them sharing this particular protected characteristic. 

 

Carer (unpaid family or friend)

 

 

x

 

Carers’ allowance claimants make up 0.98% of North Yorkshire’s population. 

 

This is lower than the average for England (1.42%) but there are variations across the county. It is likely, however, that these figures do not reflect the true number of people carrying out caring roles in the county as many do not claim allowances. 

 

Our ambitions will not have any anticipated impacts on people specifically due to them sharing this particular protected characteristic. 

 

Are from the Armed Forces Community (including veterans)

 

 

x

 

North Yorkshire has 29,831 Armed Forces Veterans. Richmondshire has the highest proportion of Armed Forces Veterans in North Yorkshire at 9.5% (3,962), which is the third highest nationally.  

 

The proportion of veterans in Richmondshire is more than double the national average rate, which is 3.8%.  

 

Harrogate has the highest number of Armed Forces Veterans in North Yorkshire with 7,076 (5.2%). 

 

Our ambitions will not have any anticipated impacts on people specifically due to them sharing this particular protected characteristic. 

 

1.4  To which Part(s) of the Public Sector Equality Duties is the Policy/decision/proposal relevant? Tick and briefly describe.

 

General Duties

Yes

No

Details

Eliminate unlawful discrimination, harassment and victimisation

x

 

The policy provides a clear and consistent framework for managing shared ownership homes, reducing the risk of inconsistent or unfair treatment and helping ensure shared owners are treated equitably.

Advance equality of opportunity

x

 

By improving clarity around rights, responsibilities and processes, the policy supports shared owners in understanding and exercising their rights regardless of background or personal circumstances.

Foster good relations between different groups

x

 

Clear, transparent policy expectations and consistent decisionmaking help promote trust, reduce misunderstandings and support positive relationships between the Council and shared owners.

1.5  Decision (Please tick one option)

Decision to recommend this policy/ decision for an Equality Impact Assessment?

 

Yes

 

 

 

No

 

x

 

If the answer is “Yes”, or you indicate a negative impact on any of the characteristics mentioned in the table above, please continue to Section 2 and complete the full Equality Impact Assessment.

If the answer is “No”, please give a brief reason here.                

The initial assessment shows no negative impacts on any protected characteristic. The proposal is a policy level framework that does not change service access, eligibility or delivery in a way that would disadvantage any group. The EIA screening indicates the policy supports consistency and fairness, and a full EIA is not required.‑level framework that does not change service access, eligibility or delivery in a way that would disadvantage any group. The EIA screening indicates the policy supports consistency and fairness, and a full EIA is not required.

 

Signed (Assistant Director or equivalent)

 

Date

 

Section 2: Equality Impact Assessment

This section aims to provide a full assessment of the actual or potential impacts on specific protected characteristics, along with NYC's additional characteristics. It will also identify the proper actions to mitigate these impacts, if needed.

 

2.1  Evidence, Consultation and Data: What data or evidence source(s) has/ have been used to inform this assessment? Select the relevant source (s):

  • Demographic data
  • Service usage data
  • Consultation feedback
  • National/local research and report
  • Expert opinion
  • Others

2.2  Stakeholder Engagement: What engagement has been done regarding the proposal and what are the results?

  • Who has been consulted?
  • How were they consulted?
  • What feedback was received?

2.3  What positive impact will this proposal have on the council budget, people, community, economic growth and environment, etc? Please explain briefly

 

2.4  Please briefly describe how will this proposal affect people with protected characteristics? Only those who are identified as relevant to the proposal in section 1.

protected characteristics

Negative

Don’t know

Why will it have this effect? Provide evidence from engagement, consultation and/or service user data or demographic information, etc.

Age

 

 

 

 

Disability

 

 

 

 

Sex

 

 

 

 

Race (including GRTS)

 

 

 

 

Gender reassignment

 

 

 

 

Sexual orientation

 

 

 

 

Religion or belief

 

 

 

 

Pregnancy or maternity

 

 

 

 

Marriage or civil partnership

 

 

 

 

NYC’s additional characteristics

People in rural areas

 

 

 

People on a low income

 

 

 

Carer (unpaid family or friend)

 

 

 

Are from the Armed Forces Community (including veterans)

 

 

 

2.5 Geographic impact: Please detail where the impact will be (please tick all that apply)

North Yorkshire wide

 

 

Craven

 

 

Hambleton

 

 

Harrogate

 

 

Richmondshire

 

Ryedale

 

 

Scarborough

 

 

Selby

 

 

If you have ticked one or more areas, will specific town(s)/ village(s) be particularly impacted? If so, please specify below.

 

 

 

 

2.6  Will the proposal affect anyone more because of a combination of protected characteristics? (e.g. older women or young gay men) State what you think the effect may be and why, citing evidence from Q2.1 & Q2.2, e.g. engagement, consultation and/or service user data or demographic information, etc.

 

 

 

 

 

2.7  Mitigation and Actions: List the actions that will be taken to reduce or eliminate any negative impact identified above and how positive impacts will be enhanced. Briefly describe the action you defined.

Actions

Lead

By when

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.8  Monitoring and Review: If the proposal is to be implemented, how will the impact be monitored? Briefly describe the monitoring arrangements/systems that will be put in place to find out how the expected outcomes have been achieved in practice.

 

 

2.9  Conclusion: Please summarise the findings of your EIA, including impacts, recommendations in relation to addressing impacts, including any legal advice, and next steps. This summary should be used as part of the report to the decision maker.

2.10       Sign off section

This full EIA was completed by: Imogen Downie

 

Job title: Housing Policy & Strategy Officer

Directorate: Community Development

Signature:

 

Completion date: 18/02/2026

 

Authorised by relevant Assistant Director (signature): A Rowe

 

Date: 18 February 2026

 

Once this has been signed off, please send it to webteam@northyorks.gov.uk for publication on the appropriate webpage.

 

 

Publication:

 

To help people find completed EIAs, we publish them in the Equality and Diversity section of the NY Council website.

Contact details

 

If you need further support and guidance about carrying out EIA, please contact your directorate equality representative as listed in Stage 4 on our Intranet: Paying due regard to equality using equality impact assessments

Or contact North Yorkshire Council’s equality team on email Equality@northyorks.gov.uk